TODAY'S LESSON ON WHO SARAH PALIN REPUBLICAN VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IS

In this video we learn she doesn't belong to any Church. She doesn't know any Prayer to say. She believes in Evolution. One of her best friends of 30 years is Gay. She doesn't read newspapers and magazines.

Okay. Okay. Not belonging to a Church. That I can understand. I don't believe in organized religion either. I'm a Christian. Evolution? That's good. Gotta agree with her there. Heck, I went from Total Apeman willing to Bone anything to a responsible Father and Husband in a span of Forty years. Friend is Gay? Right on. My Brother is. Doesn't read newspapers and magazines? Errr???? Is it any wonder she is so uninformed about the world around her? As for not knowing any Prayer, Sarah, just what did Jesus say when asked by his Disciples on what to Pray? She obviously has not read the Bible either. Why the "Religious Right" would support her is beyond me. 'Cept she is against Abortion. Yet so was Bush II. And what Pray tell did he accomplish on that issue?

We also learn in this article, when it came down to Brass Tacks or Iron Bars as the case maybe, Murlene Wilkes chose to not Lie on the stand for Sarah Palin concerning Palins' abuse of office and personal vendetta against her Sister's former husband. The final report on that is due October 10th.

In Good News we find 440 West Virginia Coal Mine workers gave the NRA a group moon.

In Funny News, Freepers have only Prayer to rely on when it comes to Palin and her upcoming debacle this Thursday when she debates Senator Biden.

SUPPORT AMERICA JOHN McCAIN

Vote Vets has a new ad out. Will the Senator answer the Lady?


Here is my take on the debate in Cleveland -
1)I found it Hefreakinglarious that Sen. Clinton complained of being asked the 1st question all the time. She even asked why. Which went unanswered.
The men knowing that Political Correctness is the watchword of the day could not answer honestly. The honest answer (or at least mine)would of went like this,
"Excuse me Senator Clinton, but I was born in 1961 and raised to let the Lady go 1st."

Sen. Clinton's attacks fell pretty flat.
The most effective attacks on Sen. Obama came from the questions on Farrakhan. I don't mean they had any merit. However as is the wont of a supporter to put words in a candidates mouth, I would have after they kept pressing the point, was to say, "You are trying to take the words of another and put them in my mouth. I don't think anybody's buying it, but good luck." In the end he did very well on it. Sen. Clinton's attack on "denouncing" or "rejecting" was pretty weak and Sen. Obama showed just how weak it was.
Sen. Clinton's most lame attack was her lie that Sen. Obama would "bomb Pakistan". He also handled that very well.
On persona, Sen. Clinton looked as bitter as ever.
Sen. Obama looked like he was, well a President(but I admit, I'm biased on that one).

Security - If one noticed the SS was real tight up on Sen. Obama after the debate when the candidates went to sign and greet the front row. One SS man almost grabbed the left arm of Sen. Obama as if he was ready to pull him back and shield. It seemed to me that Sen Obama was keeping that elbow available to grab. The 2 SS men closest were really looking at the crowd hard.

There was only one SS man that I could see near Sen. Clinton during the signing and greet. He hung back with hands crossed.

It was a good debate and though I'm sure we all had wished our respective candidates had said this or that or the "Moderators" were less invective towards our Man or Woman I think that it was more of a service to the American voting public than any other of the debates. And what the hey, at least there were not any, "Diamonds or Pearls" questions.
Peace.